Four! was Re: Two major releases per year instead of three
Lester Caine
lester at lsces.co.uk
Fri Aug 5 07:53:37 UTC 2011
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> Or do you (Lester) mean SuSE Professional is distributing an "unsafe and
> insufficiently tested" Mercurial version compared to openSUSE? That
> would be unusual.
My problem was the devel:tools repo.
I've lost track of the history of why devel:tools was needed, but it is on my
notes for getting GIT working, while I was originally loading all the hg stuff
manually.
SUSE11.3 only has hg1.5.3 and 11.4 has hg1.7.5, but neither of the base repos
have any other of the devel:tools components, and I'm not sure today why the
installed versions were updated, but currently it is doing what I would have
EXPECTED and is flagging that there are updates available to both git and hg
without actually installing anything ... which is good because none of the hg
component updates yet match the manual installed stuff.
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//
Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list