Mercurial with Trac

[Na'Tosha Bard]

On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Robin Pellatt <pellatt at bigfoot.com> wrote:

> Hi Folks,
>
> I am currently using Trac with SVN, and really like the tight integration
> between the tickets, the wiki and the source code.  I am now looking into
> moving to Mercurial.  I have tested the Mercurial plugin for Trac and it
> seems to work nicely, but my concern here is that with Mercurial I may get a
> proliferation of repositories, making it hard to keep track of the
> connections between Trac and each repository.  Has anybody had a successful
> experience of using Trac with Mercurial on large projects?
> Alternatively, is there a better tool than Trac for working with Mercurial?
>  I have looked at Rhodecode which looks great for managing the repositories
> but doesn’t integrate with Trac; and also am currently testing Kiln, but the
> integration between Kiln and FogBugz doesn’t look as tight as Trac’s (it’s
> also not Open Source).


We use Kiln and feel like it is the best tool available for on-your-server
installations at the moment.   What integration between Kiln and FogBugz are
you wanting that is missing?

Cheers,
Na'Tosha

-- 
*Na'Tosha Bard*
Build & Infrastructure Developer | Unity Technologies

*E-Mail:* natosha at unity3d.com
*Skype:* natosha.bard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20110809/32aac84a/attachment-0002.html>