problems with mercurial-1.9.1 install on MacOsX Lion

[Paul Boddie]

On 10/08/11 11:48, Tom Anderson wrote:
> On 10 August 2011 10:42, Mads Kiilerich<mads at kiilerich.com>  wrote:
>> However, the maintainer or someone from the community should update
>> http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/Download
>
> Zoinks, yes. Those version numbers should probably be dated, and the
> links could perhaps be links to the package info pages. I'd happily do
> the editing, but the page says 'Immutable Page' to me.

The WhatsNew page has release dates, at least, but as I pointed out 
before, the section numbering then manages to add to the confusion:

http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/WhatsNew

It is of no consequence that, say, Mercurial 1.7.5 is section 8 of that 
page. I would argue dropping section numbers from these kinds of pages 
where different numbering schemes are present.

Paul