Mercurial with Trac

[Robin Pellatt]

Hi Max,

Yes, some interesting points, I guess I should run with it on a test project
and see if it works for me. Thx

On 9 August 2011 15:35, Max Kovgan <arcteam.sb at gmail.com> wrote:

> hi there.
>
> I am in a similar situation, and I've been gathering lots of hg experience
> lately.
>
> IMHO, there is no problem with profileration, because trac itself is not
> distributed.
> Thus, it would be not wise to put every repo clone under trac.
> trac is a centralized server, so it should be treated as such.
>
> you may need repo per project (if you use multi-project setup), but if you
> don't need it -
> It should work with 1 repository you can back up, and push to from all the
> clones.
>
> You may consider named branches for long-running features or deployment
> related directions (stable, staging, testing, etc.)
> and this would keep everything in order: tickets, users, revisions, etc.
>
> I don't know about your security requirements,
> but it may require some ssh'ing or acl extension to set the central repo
> the way you need.
> Also, I think a good idea would be to use identical authentication
> mechanism for push/pull access setup, so
> both tickets and the commits are shown to be done by the same "entities",
> i.e. users.
>
> Hope this is helpful.
>
> Max.
>
>
> On 08/09/2011 02:10 PM, Robin Pellatt wrote:
>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> I am currently using Trac with SVN, and really like the tight integration
>> between the tickets, the wiki and the source code. I am now looking into
>> moving to Mercurial. I have tested the Mercurial plugin for Trac and it
>> seems to work nicely, but my concern here is that with Mercurial I may get a
>> proliferation of repositories, making it hard to keep track of the
>> connections between Trac and each repository. Has anybody had a successful
>> experience of using Trac with Mercurial on large projects?
>> Alternatively, is there a better tool than Trac for working with
>> Mercurial? I have looked at Rhodecode which looks great for managing the
>> repositories but doesn’t integrate with Trac; and also am currently testing
>> Kiln, but the integration between Kiln and FogBugz doesn’t look as tight as
>> Trac’s (it’s also not Open Source).
>>
>> Thanks for any help,
>> Robin
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Mercurial mailing list
>> Mercurial at selenic.com
>> http://selenic.com/mailman/**listinfo/mercurial<http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ArcTeam
> SharedBook ltd.
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Mercurial mailing list
> Mercurial at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/**listinfo/mercurial<http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20110810/c2b6fc27/attachment-0002.html>