Missing revlogs on new, empty repository

Matt Mackall mpm at selenic.com
Fri Aug 19 04:30:43 UTC 2011


[cc:ing back to the list]

On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 15:34 -0700, Marty Thornley wrote:
> Forgive my ignorance, but not familiar yet with the traceback command. Is that added along with the clone command or run that after?
> 
> Did you want results of clone from bitbucket->newRepository or newRepository->local?

Take the command/scenario that was giving you an error, repeat it,
except this time with the --traceback flag so that we have more
information.

> Also... I don't think I mentioned... When I am pulling or cloning to local I am using SourceTree on a Mac

Never heard of it. Please run Mercurial directly or take it up with the
SourceTree project.

> On Aug 18, 2011, at 3:20 PM, Matt Mackall wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 15:16 -0700, martythornley wrote:
> >> Yep. Just went to the page in the browser and it works fine.
> >> 
> >> Also, I can clone a repository from bitbuket into the directory, work on it, commit and push back up - all works fine.
> >> 
> >> I thought cloning from bitbucket might pull in a repository that was
> >> created properly. But when I then try to clone that to local, I get
> >> the same error, even though it seems to talk to bitbucket fine.
> > 
> > Please post the results of running your clone with --traceback.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
> > 
> > 


-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.





More information about the Mercurial mailing list