hg equivalent of git stash

Matt Mackall mpm at selenic.com
Mon Dec 12 22:13:02 UTC 2011


On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 00:40 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Masklinn <masklinn at masklinn.net> wrote:
> 
> > On 2011-12-12, at 18:09 , anatoly techtonik wrote:
> > > I am puzzled. After 'hg qref -X .', 'hg qdiff' and 'hg diff' show the
> > same
> > > info. Did I break something?
> > `hg qref -X` removes everything from the MQ patch, so you now have:
> > * A working copy in its original (dirty) state
> > * A completely empty applied MQ patch
> >
> > It's perfectly normal that qdiff and diff show the same output, as qdiff
> > is the sum of the current mq patch and the current working copy diff. If
> > the patch is empty, it is the same thing as a direct diff.
> >
> 
> It appears that misunderstood `hg qdiff` command from the moment I first
> used it (and it was a while since then). =) I thought it is used to show
> the contents of current patch.

The fundamental thing to understand about MQ is that an applied patch IS
A CHANGESET. Thus all commands that can show the diff of an existing
changeset will work, no special MQ-specific commands are necessary.

So you can use:

- hg log -vpr <rev>
- hg diff -c <rev>
- hg export <rev>
- hg outgoing -p

etc..

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.





More information about the Mercurial mailing list