hg equivalent of git stash
Paul Boddie
paul.boddie at biotek.uio.no
Tue Dec 13 11:55:50 UTC 2011
On 12/12/11 22:32, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>
> Yes. Not as beautiful as Matt's ad promised. =) You also need to type in
> your patch name in the last command, so it becomes much harder to be
> automated.
I don't really know why Matt made that "ad". Every query about using mq
I can recall him responding to has elicited the advice to try something
simpler first. Maybe he knows that you like a challenge. ;-)
[...]
> At least we now all agree that this is ugly and user experience is pretty
> bad compared to Git. The question is if you are going to fix that?
I'm not sure that it is a bad user experience if you just use the other
extensions. Maybe mq makes more sense if you're used to stuff like
quilt, with which I've had some recent, brief experiences and which
looks quite similar superficially.
Paul
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list