repo with patched external libraries, proper way to do

David Manura dm.lua at math2.org
Mon Feb 14 15:42:38 UTC 2011


On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Giorgos Keramidas
<keramida at ceid.upatras.gr> wrote:
> I often use different named branches
> for each library's "upstream" branch, e.g.:
>
>    default                 - main trunk of development
>    vendor/libfoo           - upstream drops of lib/libfoo sources

Thank you.  Is there any reason though to use one upstream branch per
library (e.g. "vendor/libfoo") rather than one upstream branch for all
libraries (e.g. "vendor")?


More information about the Mercurial mailing list