repo with patched external libraries, proper way to do
David Manura
dm.lua at math2.org
Mon Feb 14 15:42:38 UTC 2011
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Giorgos Keramidas
<keramida at ceid.upatras.gr> wrote:
> I often use different named branches
> for each library's "upstream" branch, e.g.:
>
> default - main trunk of development
> vendor/libfoo - upstream drops of lib/libfoo sources
Thank you. Is there any reason though to use one upstream branch per
library (e.g. "vendor/libfoo") rather than one upstream branch for all
libraries (e.g. "vendor")?
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list