bring two repositories back together
Kevin Bullock
kbullock+mercurial at ringworld.org
Mon May 16 22:28:20 UTC 2011
(cc'ing back to the list, please keep discussion on-list)
On 16 May 2011, at 11:08 AM, John Stean wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >Have you merged the two branches together in B?
>
> We pull changes from A into B, so B always is all of A plus its own changes - merging any conflict using B and ignoring A
So you're not just pulling, but pulling -and merging-? In Mercurial, they are separate operations.
> >Do you want the changes from A incorporated into B's branch?
>
> All I want is to end up with one repo again, known as A .
>
> I tried a dummy run where I renames A's path, pull -u, then rename A back. Seemed to work...
Yup, a repo is self-contained and it doesn't matter to Mercurial what you name it or where you put it. You can pull from any clone into any other (related) clone.
pacem in terris / mir / shanti / salaam / heiwa
Kevin R. Bullock
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20110516/aedeb0e8/attachment.html>
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list