status and subrepos

[William]

On 24-05-2011, Kevin Bullock wrote:
> On 23 May 2011, at 11:28 AM, William wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I'm sure there is a good reason that status doesn't show subrepos by 
>> default instead of commit, but i don't remember... Could you point me to 
>> the thread wich explain why ?
>
>
> The short answer is that you can't transparently commit a file in a subrepo—i.e. if `hg st` were to show a changed file in a subrepo, you can't then `hg ci FILE` or `hg log FILE` or similar things (yet).
>

Something disturb me is that status doesn't show the same as commit (by 
default).
Then, i use directly commit and look at the HG: lines to see what's 
going on.

-- 
William Dodé - http://flibuste.net
Informaticien Indépendant