Obsolete Markers and Phases

[Pierre-Yves David]

On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 10:27:35AM -0400, Boggess, Rod wrote:
> Not sure if my opinion is worth much, but i can see real value in being able
> to put a marker on a node in a branch to mark it and its ancestors as not
> useful for cloning. From what little I know of Mercurial's hash codes, this
> would require significant coding, but would have a definite impact on
> performance, and its value would only increase as repositories age.

See abandonned changesets plan (discussed in another reply of this thread)


-- 
Pierre-Yves David

http://www.logilab.fr/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20120803/bb27f5d9/attachment.asc>