Anyone know a good link for MQ Patches in TortoiseHG?

[v]

Greg Ward-3 wrote
> 
> On 02 August 2012, Boggess, Rod said:
>> I'm considering this as an alternative to the
>> normal per-customer terminal branches in a commercial application, and
>> I'm wondering which of the two options is more manageable.
> 
> That does not sound like a good use case for MQ. If a binary is built
> and deployed to customers, you really want the source for that binary
> to be stored safely in your source control system.
> 

I'm not entirely clear what Rod's requirements are, but they sound like the
"Advanced uses of Mercurial Queues" chapter from Mercurial: The Definitive
Guide.

http://hgbook.red-bean.com/read/advanced-uses-of-mercurial-queues.html



--
View this message in context: http://mercurial.808500.n3.nabble.com/Anyone-know-a-good-link-for-MQ-Patches-in-TortoiseHG-tp3991409p3991493.html
Sent from the General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.