speeding up hg pull?

[Rian Hunter]

On Aug 27, 2012, at 5:24 AM, Ryan Brown <mp3geek at gmail.com> wrote:

> Anytime we commit something, it'll hg pull/hg push we could be waiting
> around 35-40seconds.. Which slows things down.
> 
> We're not trying "shortening the response time", .. 140-150ms is fine,
> hg via ssh is horribly slow, compared to using Putty.
> 
> Pull and Pushing isn't dependent on load (most of the time, 2 people
> using it at a specific time), but even when you're the only one on the
> server, its still slow.
> 
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby
> <mihamina at rktmb.org> wrote:
>> On 08/27/2012 02:52 PM, Ryan Brown wrote:
>>> 
>>> We're using mercurial-server for ssh specifically, performance wise is
>>> that okay or is there better?
>> 
>> 
>> You're looking for a way to have a shorter response time than 140-150ms?
>> How frequent do you push or pull per developper?
>> 
>> --
>> RMA.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mercurial mailing list
>> Mercurial at selenic.com
>> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial mailing list
> Mercurial at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial