Regular repository corruption -- help needed.

[Bryan O'Sullivan]

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Alexander Krauss <krauss at in.tum.de> wrote:

>
> I see. Is this analysis consistent with the fact that already-existing
> changesets get corrupted by the push?


Are you sure that's what is happening? Because that is not what I see in
the repo tarball you posted. In that case, the corruption is very
definitely just at the end of the changelog file.

You say you've seen this happen on a "plain local push", too - but was
>> that also on an NFS filesystem? (I bet you a pfennig it was.)
>>
>
> Yes. Here, local just meant that no ssh was involved. Both source and
> destination repository live on NFS.
>

OK, so that's not quite a local push. If source and destination are only
visible to one user, then that's interesting. If one or other is shared
among several users, I'd be getting nervous if I were you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20121222/13f3f84b/attachment-0002.html>