clone vs copy

Pierre Imbaud pierre.imbaud at gmail.com
Mon Jan 9 10:51:39 UTC 2012


Thanks a lot, thats exactly what I needed!

On 01/06/2012 09:57 PM, Kevin Grover wrote:
> I'm not sure if there's a simpler way (and I don't have hg on this
> machine to test), but if you did clone it, then the destination repo
> will have a file '.hg/hgrc' with
>
> [paths]
> default = URL_TO_SRC_REPO
>
> Which will be used automatically for push, pull, incoming, and outgoing
> calls.   If you did copy it, you can add that file/clause manually to
> have the same functionality.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:38, Pierre Imbaud <pierre.imbaud at gmail.com
> <mailto:pierre.imbaud at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     beginner with mercurial, I have a very simple problem:
>     I develop on my laptop, and use remote machines to run the test.
>     How can I tell, weeks later, wether the copy I find on the remote
>     machine has been cloned, or just plain copied? I suspect I did copy
>     (thru rsync), Id love to be able to confirm.
>
>
>     Thanks.
>
>     _________________________________________________
>     Mercurial mailing list
>     Mercurial at selenic.com <mailto:Mercurial at selenic.com>
>     http://selenic.com/mailman/__listinfo/mercurial
>     <http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial>
>
>





More information about the Mercurial mailing list