clone vs copy
Pierre Imbaud
pierre.imbaud at gmail.com
Mon Jan 9 10:51:39 UTC 2012
Thanks a lot, thats exactly what I needed!
On 01/06/2012 09:57 PM, Kevin Grover wrote:
> I'm not sure if there's a simpler way (and I don't have hg on this
> machine to test), but if you did clone it, then the destination repo
> will have a file '.hg/hgrc' with
>
> [paths]
> default = URL_TO_SRC_REPO
>
> Which will be used automatically for push, pull, incoming, and outgoing
> calls. If you did copy it, you can add that file/clause manually to
> have the same functionality.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:38, Pierre Imbaud <pierre.imbaud at gmail.com
> <mailto:pierre.imbaud at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> beginner with mercurial, I have a very simple problem:
> I develop on my laptop, and use remote machines to run the test.
> How can I tell, weeks later, wether the copy I find on the remote
> machine has been cloned, or just plain copied? I suspect I did copy
> (thru rsync), Id love to be able to confirm.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> _________________________________________________
> Mercurial mailing list
> Mercurial at selenic.com <mailto:Mercurial at selenic.com>
> http://selenic.com/mailman/__listinfo/mercurial
> <http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial>
>
>
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list