Use a thin shell repository to manage guest repos?
Todd Greer
TGreer at affinegy.com
Mon Nov 26 18:38:28 UTC 2012
Peter, we've found guestrepos to also work quite well in a 'thick' non-shell top-level repository model. We tried the 'thin shell' approach (with subrepositories), and found that it did not match our needs well.
Paul, congratulations on making a tool that is flexible enough to work well, even outside the scenario it was designed for.
--
Todd
From: mercurial-bounces at selenic.com [mailto:mercurial-bounces at selenic.com] On Behalf Of paul_nathan at selinc.com
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 10:51 AM
To: Peter Haase
Cc: mercurial-bounces at selenic.com; mercurial at selenic.com
Subject: Re: Use a thin shell repository to manage guest repos?
Peter,
The 'thin' shell repository model is what guestrepos is designed for.
- - -
Regards,
Paul Nathan
mercurial-bounces at selenic.com wrote on 11/26/2012 05:33:25 AM:
> From: Peter Haase <kontakt at phaase.net>
> To: mercurial at selenic.com,
> Date: 11/26/2012 05:33 AM
> Subject: Use a thin shell repository to manage guest repos?
> Sent by: mercurial-bounces at selenic.com
>
> When using sub repositories it's recommend to use 'thin' shell
> repositories only, i.e. separate 'real' code from repositories used to
> manage subrepositories (
> http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/Subrepository#Recommendations ).
>
> I wonder if this is also true if using the guest repository extension.
> Does someone has some experiences?
>
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial mailing list
> Mercurial at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list