Use a thin shell repository to manage guest repos?

Todd Greer TGreer at affinegy.com
Mon Nov 26 18:38:28 UTC 2012


Peter, we've found guestrepos to also work quite well in a 'thick' non-shell top-level repository model. We tried the 'thin shell' approach (with subrepositories), and found that it did not match our needs well.

Paul, congratulations on making a tool that is flexible enough to work well, even outside the scenario it was designed for.

--
Todd

From: mercurial-bounces at selenic.com [mailto:mercurial-bounces at selenic.com] On Behalf Of paul_nathan at selinc.com
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 10:51 AM
To: Peter Haase
Cc: mercurial-bounces at selenic.com; mercurial at selenic.com
Subject: Re: Use a thin shell repository to manage guest repos?

Peter, 

The 'thin' shell repository model is what guestrepos is designed for. 

- - -
Regards,
Paul Nathan 

mercurial-bounces at selenic.com wrote on 11/26/2012 05:33:25 AM:

> From: Peter Haase <kontakt at phaase.net> 
> To: mercurial at selenic.com, 
> Date: 11/26/2012 05:33 AM 
> Subject: Use a thin shell repository to manage guest repos? 
> Sent by: mercurial-bounces at selenic.com 
> 
> When using sub repositories it's recommend to use 'thin' shell
> repositories only, i.e. separate 'real' code from repositories used to
> manage subrepositories (
> http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/Subrepository#Recommendations ).
> 
> I wonder if this is also true if using the guest repository extension.
> Does someone has some experiences?
> 
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial mailing list
> Mercurial at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial



More information about the Mercurial mailing list