hg recover

[Simon King]

On 2 Oct 2012, at 22:12, "Jensen, Aaron" <ajensen at webmd.net> wrote:

>> Using a HTTP server is always nice: it gives you better performance since you're only sending the diffs over the network -- a
>> Mercurial client that accesses a file over a network drive will behave as if the files on the drive are local and depending on the
>> implementation of the network filesystem, this means more data is downloaded to the client than strictly necessary.
>
> In our experience, http is MUCH slower, especially when cloning.
>
>

Have you tried "hg clone --uncompressed" with http? It can make a huge
difference.

Simon