Why we didn't migrate to Mercurial (long)
Todd Greer
TGreer at affinegy.com
Thu Oct 4 16:30:46 UTC 2012
Where I work, most developers that work on Windows use thg, and seem to like it. Any workflow that calls for command-line usage is met with some resistance, though the fact that you can enter commands in the log window is one of the best features ever. We have another group that is used to using Eclipse-integrated svn, and is moving to Eclipse-integrated hg as soon as some bug gets resolved. They haven't tried thg. Our Mac developers had a poor experience when they tried it, but it may have improved since then.
We're about to adopt the guest-repo extension, and one of the concerns we had to overcome is its lack of support in thg, which speaks well of our opinion of thg.
--
Todd Greer
Director of Development, Affinegy, Inc.
From: mercurial-bounces at selenic.com [mailto:mercurial-bounces at selenic.com] On Behalf Of paul_nathan at selinc.com
Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2012 10:51 AM
To: Angel Ezquerra
Cc: Stephen Morton; ezquerra at gmail.com; mercurial at selenic.com
Subject: Re: Why we didn't migrate to Mercurial (long)
ezquerra at gmail.com<mailto:ezquerra at gmail.com> wrote on 10/04/2012 06:42:07 AM:
[snip]
> > - TortoiseHG works everywhere. (BTW, its widely opined by different user
> > groups that thg is lousy for anything but viewing the graph. I've not delved
> > into specifics and can't report the details)
>
> Paul,
>
> it would be great if you could expand on this. We would love to be
> able to improve TortoiseHg further, so all opinions, particularly
> critical ones, are welcome.
>
> I personally really like the current version of TortoiseHg, but it is
> not perfect. Perhaps I cannot see some of its flaws because I am so
> familiar and invested on it... Getting someone else's opinion is
> always very useful.
>
>
[snip]
Angel,
I'll canvas what I can and forward the information to you. Be aware that we have very different users and one might say "X is the worst thing", another might say "X is the best thing".
- - -
Regards,
Paul Nathan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20121004/df2754c4/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list