Hg push tries to push data to repo without any changes

[Roman Kamyk jr]

Thanks for explanation, I will try to become more acquainted with phases,
but a quick check:
$ hg log -r "not public()"
show nothing. I would like to know what's there to push directly after a
clone, when nothing locally happened to the repo. I would file a bug
already if not that it happens just on one machine.
Best,


On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Mads Kiilerich <mads at kiilerich.com> wrote:

> On 01/23/2013 03:21 PM, Roman Kamyk jr wrote:
>
>> Thanks for answer - but please take a look in the logs - the problem
>> occurs even when I do not use surepos, when I clone empty repository, hg
>> out doesn't show any changes, and yet hg push tries to push something...
>>
>
> It is ok that an attempt at pushing to a place where you don't have push
> access fails. It only become a problem in the context of subrepos.
>
> 'hg out' will only show outgoing changesets. 'hg push' can also push
> bookmarks and phases and do other things.
>
> But you could file a bug at bitbucket for not supporting phases
> "correctly" (if that is the case - I think it is), file a bug at Mercurial
> for implementing phases as a showstopper, or study 'hg help phases' to find
> a way to work around the problem.
>
> /Mads
>
>


-- 
Roman Kamyk
email/jabber: roman.kamyk at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20130123/2b57a9b8/attachment-0002.html>