hg-git converted repo is massive
Sean Farley
sean.michael.farley at gmail.com
Wed Jan 30 16:38:31 UTC 2013
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Matt Mackall <mpm at selenic.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 10:34 -0600, Sean Farley wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Matt Mackall <mpm at selenic.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 10:25 -0600, Sean Farley wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Augie Fackler <lists at durin42.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Harvey Chapman <hchapman-hg at 3gfp.com> wrote:
>> >> >> Is there any downside to using hg-git with generaldelta?
>> >> >
>> >> > Not AFAIK.
>> >>
>> >> So, could hg-git enable it by default (if possible)?
>> >
>> > It's not ready for prime time.
>> >
>> > Nor is sufficiently good yet to be worth the trouble. Some repos are
>> > known to get larger!
>>
>> Ah! I did not know that. I was somehow under the impression that it
>> wasn't ready due to the missing wire protocol.
>
> That's a problem too. It will be significantly slower over the wire.
And now I has the sad.
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list