Mercurial popularity is stagnant
Lester Caine
lester at lsces.co.uk
Wed Jul 2 20:04:59 UTC 2014
On 02/07/14 20:37, wilk wrote:
>> Better hg-git support would be nice, but I don't think that's what
>> > preventing hg adoption. It's certainly not the reason git usage is
>> > spiking while hg is stagnant.
> It's what said friends when i suggest them to use mercurial. They would
> like, they see my points, but because they must use github for wathever
> reason, they choose git to don't need to learn two tools.
I'm forced to co-operate with github on various projects, but I still
prefer thg/hg-git as the way to access it. Github itself is a right P in
the A to ACTUALLY see what commits have been added, and so my own hg
mirror also provides a much cleaner display. There are things that can
be improved, but that applies to most of the current mess that is now
replacing what was a perfectly functional system 10 years ago ... most
interfaces are being 'improved' when there is no reason to even touch
them ...
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list