privacy policy

[Alan Mackenzie]

Hello, Tugba.

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 04:39:46PM +0100, Tugba Gündogdu wrote:
> Hello,

> we´re currently reviewing our companies toolchain on SHA (Save Harbour
> Agreement) compliance internally.
> Since we couldn´t find any statement regarding this in your privacy policy
> we like to know wether <Company/Tool> is compliant to SHA or not.

> We´d be glad if you can provide a feedback on short note.

I'm not part of the Mercurial project, so it's not really for me to say.

But it might help get good answers if you could briefly outline what the
"Save [?Safe] Harbour Agreement" actually is.

It sounds to me like it might have something to do with network
infrastructure companies having, or not having responsibility for
copyright infringement perpetrated on their networks.  If that is the
case, then it would seem Mercurial, being a tool for managing file
versions, is outside of its scope, much as a sack of potatoes would be.

But that depends on what the SHA really is.

> Best Regards

> Tugba Gündogdu

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).