Git vs Mercurial branches

[Charles Gallo]

Yes, that is the plan. Part of the need is to keep the SVN repo around for certain projects, so this question is to help me choose which tool meets our needs better

--  
73 de KG2V
Charlie

> On Apr 22, 2015, at 8:47 PM, Benjamin Smith <lists at benjamindsmith.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 05:40:13 PM Avner Silberman wrote:
>> Rather than focus on the minutiae of how features are implemented and how
>> you do something in one system vs the other, I've been looking at reasons
>> why one system may be preferable to another from a corporate perspective.
>> As a closed source shop what might be key features or missing features that
>> would sway the decision?
> 
> I love Mercurial! As a tool, it's done me well, and I too like the simplicity 
> of it, the ability to set up a repo anywhere, etc. 
> 
> Realistically, though, if you've picked your tool and are trying to justify 
> its use, you're doing it wrong. 
> 
> Identify the *needs* that your organization has, and then work back from 
> there. Git and Mercurial are both high-quality, similar products, similar 
> enough that you probably aren't going to make a major mistake either way. 
> Focus on the needs of your organization and drive the decision from there. 
> That way you're most sure to make the best decision. 
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial mailing list
> Mercurial at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial