recommended ppa for "actual" hg for kubuntu trusty
Gregory Szorc
gregory.szorc at gmail.com
Mon Aug 10 22:04:42 UTC 2015
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Pierre-Yves David <
pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 08/10/2015 02:46 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Matt Mackall <mpm at selenic.com
>> <mailto:mpm at selenic.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2015-08-10 at 14:13 -0700, Bosco Rama wrote:
>> > Sorry to revive an old thread...
>> >
>> > On 03/25/15 16:07, Matt Mackall wrote:
>> > >
>> > > FYI, we've got a couple people interested in bringing the PPA
>> back to
>> > > life in addition to further automating the creation of .debs
>> independent
>> > > of Debian/Ubuntu.
>> >
>> > I'm very interested to know if there has been any advancement on
>> this
>> > front. I'm concerned mainly because it is affecting my ability to
>> > champion hg in my work environment.
>>
>> You can now run make debian-jessie or make docker-debian-jessie to
>> build
>> a jessie .deb. Tweaking that to work for Ubuntu releases should be
>> simple; left as an exercise for the Ubuntu-sphere.
>>
>>
>> We publish RPMs at https://mercurial.selenic.com/release/. Would it be
>> possible to publish .deb files as well? This has recently come up at
>> Mozilla as well. It would be nice if there were official'ish .deb files
>> we could point people at.
>>
>
> If someone provide a easily build-able debian package
> -compatible-with-upstream-debian-. I would happily add this to my
> nightly-builder.
>
Pinging Mike Hommey!
>
> Is there mozilla user of the rpm?
Mozilla (at least the hg.mozilla.org bits) is using RPMs produced by the
in-tree make targets. We don't use the RPMs from selenic.com because we are
paranoid about security.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20150810/7d6fee57/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list