Why did "hg push", push my local bookmark to remote?
Jaikiran Pai
jai.forums2013 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 6 05:46:35 UTC 2015
I used to be a git user but have been using mercurial in a recent
project, for a while now. Just recently, I decided to use the "bookmark"
feature of mercurial to have lightweight branches similar to git. The
documentation at various places about bookmark suggests that if I have a
(local) bookmark and commits in that booking and I'm pushing to a remote
repository, then the commits to the bookmark will *not* be pushed to the
remote repository unless the remote repository has that bookmark too.
That's a good thing and that's what I want. However, that doesn't seem
to be how it's working (I was on 2.8 version of mercurial but it's the
same with 3.3 too). Here's what I did:
hg bookmark test-bookmark // create a new bookmark
hg up test-bookmark // up to that bookmark
... update an existing file in the workspace
hg commit -m "Dummy test commit in bookmark" // commit the local change
hg push // push to remote
To my surprise, the commit that I did to the bookmark got pushed to the
remote repo and is now visible/available to everyone and has the
potential to cause problems (since it was a work in progress change). I
didn't explicitly push the bookmark, yet it got pushed to remote by a
plain hg push. Did I miss something about how bookmarks work in mercurial?
-Jaikiran
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list