Advice re. implementing Mercurial

Arne Babenhauserheide arne_bab at web.de
Mon Feb 9 09:16:38 UTC 2015


Am Montag, 9. Februar 2015, 08:42:27 schrieb David Capps:
> When you begin submitting your commits for review (and if you submit them with "hg push" to some remote repo) it's too late to rebase.

Wouldn’t it work to mark the QA repos as non-publishing?

That would preserve the draft phase and would also follow the
semantics of draft: Changesets become public once QA approved them.

Best wishes,
Arne
--
Celebrate with ye beauty and gather yer friends for a Pirate Party!
    → http://1w6.org/english/flyerbook-rules#pirate-party ←

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 299 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20150209/de308924/attachment.asc>


More information about the Mercurial mailing list