Thanks for the hg facilities!

[Arne Babenhauserheide]

Am Montag, 29. Dezember 2014, 10:05:59 schrieb Harry .:
> Seconded. Wouldn't mind smaller repositories 

Did you try the size with different repositories? In my tests, git and
hg are very close in size, but git repos enlarge a lot when you don’t
repack + garbage collect regularly (and auto-gc does not cut it).

My test for that is a bit dated,[1] but rerunning it partially gave
similar results (a few months ago):

   http://draketo.de/proj/hg-vs-git-server/test-results.html#results

> and git-style tags either.

unversioned, centralized, “follow the canonical repo” tags? Something
like bookmarks which don’t follow your changes?

Or is there a central usability issue which disturbs you when using 
hg tags?

Best wishes,
Arne

[1]: I stopped following git development a few years ago. Whenever I
     use it, it still feels as unfriendly as when I started comparing
     both, and I did not notice other big differences in regular use.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 299 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20150103/b6a1d5a1/attachment.pgp>