Alternatives to EOL extension
Carsten Fuchs
carsten.fuchs at cafu.de
Thu Jan 15 23:54:55 UTC 2015
Hi Mads,
Am 15.01.2015 um 19:18 schrieb Mads Kiilerich:
> Yes, "the right way" is that everybody works on Linux ...
Uhhh... are you telling me that Mercurial is not so platform
independent, after all?
> or at least
> use platforms and tools that at least agree on the basics. If your world
> is different, you need something.
The trouble is what?
As mentioned in another post, at this time it seems as if users that
start a new project (that is kept in Mercurial) have to either rely on
spotless manual inspection of line endings (probably very unreliable and
prone to errors), or to come up with a checker script (simple as it may
be) as one of the first steps near the beginning of the project?
> I don't read the wiki pages as "don't use". It is clearly "use if you
> need it".
Well, I quoted from
http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/FeaturesOfLastResort in my first post,
here is another part, specifically about the EOL extension: "These
legacy features were very intentionally excluded from the Mercurial
design because their cost/benefit ratio was exceptionally bad."
This sounds pretty scary to me, and while the pages say that there are
alternatives, they don't explain or even mention anything concrete.
Best regards,
Carsten
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list