Hg update should prefer heads without bookmarks

cowwoc cowwoc at bbs.darktech.org
Wed May 27 18:14:10 UTC 2015


Hi,

Following up on this old discussion:
http://www.kevinberridge.com/2012/05/hg-bookmarks-made-me-sad.html

Is there a way to configure a Mercurial repository so that client-side "hg
clone <repo>" and "hg pull -u" resolve to the latest changeset on the
"default" branch not containing a bookmark?

Notice that I am asking for a workaround, but obviously I would prefer
changing the default behavior to do exactly that (what is the benefit of the
existing behavior anyway?)

Thank you,
Gili



--
View this message in context: http://mercurial.808500.n3.nabble.com/Hg-update-should-prefer-heads-without-bookmarks-tp4023171.html
Sent from the General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


More information about the Mercurial mailing list