Shipping hg-git by default?

[Nathan Goldbaum]

I think it would be really nice if bitbucket would at least mention
mercurial support in their marketing materials.

It's honestly a bit disheartening when I log in and see things like this in
my frontpage, despite the fact that I have no git repositories associated
with my account. I do understand why it looks like this and what the usage
statistics of git vs hg on bitbucket look like, but since Sean invited us
to comment...

http://i.imgur.com/P2KA8cw.png

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Sean Farley <sean at farley.io> wrote:

>
> anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Looks like https://bitbucket.org/ ditched Mercurial:
> >
> >     Bitbucket is the Git solution for professional teams
>
> Bitbucket has not and will not be ditching Mercurial, so calm down. The
> frontpage is controlled by the marketing team. In fact, the person that
> is in charge of that is Raj Sarkar (CC'd) and he would just *love* to
> hear what the Mercurial community thinks. (serious)
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial mailing list
> Mercurial at selenic.com
> https://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20150925/497249e4/attachment-0002.html>