Shipping hg-git by default?

[John Turner]

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Sean Farley <sean at farley.io> wrote:
>Bitbucket has not and will not be ditching Mercurial, so calm down. The
> frontpage is controlled by the marketing team. In fact, the person that
> is in charge of that is Raj Sarkar (CC'd) and he would just *love* to
> hear what the Mercurial community thinks. (serious)
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial mailing list
> Mercurial at selenic.com
> https://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial

On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 14:22:53 -0400, Nathan Goldbaum  
<nathan12343 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think it would be really nice if bitbucket would at least mention  
> mercurial support in their marketing materials.
>
> It's honestly a bit disheartening when I log in and see things like this  
> in my frontpage, despite the fact that I have no git >repositories  
> associated with my account. I do understand why it looks like this and  
> what the usage statistics of git vs hg on >bitbucket look like, but  
> since Sean invited us to comment...

I'll second that - I only have Mercurial repos on Bitbucket, and I  
wouldn't have it otherwise.
Also, the login promoting Git unfortunately belies the very helpful  
documentation they have for Mercurial.

--
John
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20150925/f13f6062/attachment-0002.html>