Shipping hg-git by default?

[Arne Babenhauserheide]

Am Freitag, 25. September 2015, 17:53:24 schrieb anatoly techtonik:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Augie Fackler <lists at durin42.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:28 AM, anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Looks like https://bitbucket.org/ ditched Mercurial:
> > >
> > >     Bitbucket is the Git solution for professional teams

> > > But.. if installation of Mercurial already included hg-git
> > > support, I could still use it to work with GitHub right of
> > > the box without an additional installation hassle, which
> > > is, of course, putting me away from that at the moment.

> [ ] better handling of history rewriting
>   [ ] modicum of phases support
>   [ ] coping with rewrites on the git side more gracefully
> [ ] UI split
> [ ] UI polish

Despite all these things, hg-git is one of the extensions I use in a
close-to-production setting. I think it’s at least as polished as the
record-extension which is shipped by default.

Best wishes,
Arne
--
singing a part of the history of free software: 

- http://infinite-hands.draketo.de

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 299 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20150926/02955d30/attachment.asc>