Shipping hg-git by default?
anatoly techtonik
techtonik at gmail.com
Tue Sep 29 05:54:26 UTC 2015
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Raj Sarkar <rsarkar at atlassian.com> wrote:
> I cannot comment on previous posts or articles since I (or Sean) were here
> at Atlassian at that time.
>
> Honestly, the no-BS version is that we are gravitating towards what our
> customers are asking for. Majority of our customers are asking for Git. Not
> many are asking for Mercurial. That doesn't mean we will stop supporting
> Mercurial. We hired Sean primarily for that reason. He is the biggest voice
> we have inside Atlassian for Mercurial :)
>
I am with Bitbucket from the times before it was acquired by Atlassian, and
it is good that the company didn't kill the original purpose of the
service. Even better are news that it is not going to kill it for now. But
sometimes I think that being rebranded as Atlassian killed the enthusiasm
to implement new features - not the ones that customer wants, but the
delighters that they don't know about. I am talking Mercurial workflow at
Facebook - big files, history on demand, filesystem watcher for immediate
status updates.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20150929/320287ce/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list