mercurial vs >= 3.0 deb for Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit

[Augie Fackler]

> On Apr 13, 2016, at 13:19, Uwe Brauer <oub at mat.ucm.es> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 13 April 2016 11:12AM, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> 
>> Is building Mercurial from source completely not an option?
> 
> Is is an option, I just had a lot of bad experience upgrading pandoc on
> Ubuntu 10.04, so I'd prefer a compiled version, but if there isn't any,
> I have to build it my own, since 1.4.1 I consider far too old.

Note that 'make deb' is a thing you can do in any recent (3.7.x certainly) source tree for hg and (assuming you have the right tools installed) it'll drop out a deb for your current OS. It'll even run the tests before it builds the deb.

(Not sure if that's helpful, but maybe it is?)

> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial mailing list
> Mercurial at mercurial-scm.org
> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial