Why bare 'hg update' needs behaviour change

Tue Dec 20 21:34:40 UTC 2016

Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> writes:

> On 12/20/2016 01:17 AM, David Demelier wrote:
>
>> I know this topic [bookmark interaction with 'hg update'] has been discussed many times.
>
> The last time I saw this discussion (several months ago now) I thought the plan was change 'hg update' to not move a bookmark; only 'hg commit' on a bookmark would update its location, or manually assigning it to some other commit.
>
> Has that not happened yet / plans have changed?

No, I just haven't gotten around to finishing that work. Sigh.