hg log -G for bookmarks

[Uwe Brauer]

>>> "Simon" == Simon King <simon at simonking.org.uk> writes:

   > Which as far as I can tell is equivalent to the git version. There
   > are 2 branches from a common ancestor. The "master" branch has a
   > single commit with description "3", and the "book1" branch contains 2
   > commits with descriptions "1" and "2".

   > Note that there are many ways to lay out the same graph, so the
   > display isn't necessarily going to be identical, but the
   > relationships between the nodes should always be the same.

I see, you are right, but  I find the hg graph easier to read. (My hope
was that git and hg would chose the same lay out for the graph, but
obviously they don't).