same name for bookmark, tag and branch
Uwe Brauer
oub at mat.ucm.es
Sat Jun 25 09:39:39 UTC 2016
Hi
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 09:30:08 +0000
This is just an experiment, I would never do that in real live
I started a fresh repo added a file and 2 commits.
- Then I added the tag master, edit and commit,
- then the branch master, edit and commit,
- and then the bookmark master (abort: a bookmark cannot have the
name of an existing branch) that seemed logical.
So I tried it the other way around
I started a fresh repo added a file and 2 commits.
- Then I added the tag master, edit and commit,
- then the bookmark master
- then the branch master, edit and commit,
That was accepted, but now
Hg update master *always* ended where the bookmark was, the tag was ignored.
Shouldn't there be a warning as well,
- once a tag is given the same name should not be used as a branch
or as a bookmark,
- once a bookmark is chosen, that name should not be used for a tag
or a branch?
regards
Uwe Brauer
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list