push content of a symbolic link to remote server.

[Arne Babenhauserheide]

Uwe Brauer <oub at mat.ucm.es> writes:

>>>> "Arne" == Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab at web.de> writes:
> Well than repo1, repo2 do not contain repo3 as a subrepo, it seems that
> I understood it correctly. Moreover I have to push repo1, repo2 repo3, correct?

Yes.

> I see two problems:
>
>
>     -  the soft links: if I share repo1 with a windows user, that
>        approach might not work.

I cannot test Windows — if you can test that it would be great if you
could test the results.

>     -  suppose I want to share repo1 and repo3 with user1 but repo2 and
>        repo3 with user2. Is that possible or do I have to share the
>        shell repo with user 1 and user 2?

You can simply share selected repos. If you want the symlink to work,
you can create multiple shells.

>     >> Maybe I sent you, off list, a tar file of an example directory in order
>     >> to see whether I understood you correctly.
>
>     > You can do that.
>
> I did that

☺

Best wishes,
Arne
-- 
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein
ohne es zu merken
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20170329/7dfe7170/attachment.asc>