Data corruption local rep, bitbucket repo has more heads than local one?

Uwe Brauer oub at mat.ucm.es
Mon May 29 13:37:37 UTC 2017


   > On Thu, 25 May 2017 04:53:32 -0400, Uwe Brauer <oub at mat.ucm.es> wrote:

   > Sorry, I've lost the context at this point. If you drop the --hidden
   > arg and run the same command in the same repo, nothing shows, right?

Yes


   > That tells me you've obsoleted this commit, but for some reason, the
   > obsolete markers aren't making it to the other repo(s). Bitbucket
   > supports evolve, doesn't it? If you push from your first repo to the
   > one with all the heads, I assume the extra heads go away?

But I have to activate evolve, which I didn't know and therefore did not
do. I activate it now.

   > Correct.  This also points to a lack of obsolete markers.


   > You may want to enable the internal blackbox extension, which tries to
   > keep a log of the things going on in your repo.


Thanks for pointing this out to me.

Uwe 




More information about the Mercurial mailing list