Data corruption local rep, bitbucket repo has more heads than local one?
Uwe Brauer
oub at mat.ucm.es
Mon May 29 13:37:37 UTC 2017
> On Thu, 25 May 2017 04:53:32 -0400, Uwe Brauer <oub at mat.ucm.es> wrote:
> Sorry, I've lost the context at this point. If you drop the --hidden
> arg and run the same command in the same repo, nothing shows, right?
Yes
> That tells me you've obsoleted this commit, but for some reason, the
> obsolete markers aren't making it to the other repo(s). Bitbucket
> supports evolve, doesn't it? If you push from your first repo to the
> one with all the heads, I assume the extra heads go away?
But I have to activate evolve, which I didn't know and therefore did not
do. I activate it now.
> Correct. This also points to a lack of obsolete markers.
> You may want to enable the internal blackbox extension, which tries to
> keep a log of the things going on in your repo.
Thanks for pointing this out to me.
Uwe
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list