sourcehut first impression, share a repo seems not to work flawlessly

[Uwe Brauer]

   > Uwe Brauer <oub at mat.ucm.es> writes:


   > That's not quite true.  They would if they forked it, however if you
   > share a repo on bitbucket with someone and give them read/write access
   > to it, they would use the same URL as the owner of the
   > repository.

You are talking about bitbucket. Ok my experience is almost entirely
with https and then 

 user1 has say repo
 user1 at bitbucket.org/user1/repo1

Then user2 clones with 

hg clone https://user2@bitbucket.org/user1/repo1

But right, this is http specific.

Independently I find it not very comfortable, that if user1 shares with
user2, user2 does not really know about it. No link is send, the repo
does not really pop up in user2 account. 



   > _______________________________________________
   > Mercurial mailing list
   > Mercurial at mercurial-scm.org
   > https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5025 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20190821/2235a1e5/attachment.p7s>