Alternative to sourcehut

[Uwe Brauer]

>>> "MM" == Malcolm Matalka <mmatalka at gmail.com> writes:

   > Uwe Brauer <oub at mat.ucm.es> writes:

   >> > On 2019-08-25 11:39, Uwe Brauer wrote:
   >> 
   >> > Hg-git can do it.  When converting from HG to Git, the branch name
   >> > will be noted in the "--HG--" section.  When converting back from Git
   >> > to HG, the branch name will be restored.
   >> 
   >> This is really great (and would explain, why I cannot see the full graph
   >> in helix nor in sourcehut)

   > Why does it explain that?  sourcehut is not storing hg repos in git
   > under the hood.

I never claimed that (I should have used «could» instead of «would».

Ludovic conjectured that helix uses a plugin. I thought that is
impossible because of named branches.

Manuel told me that the hg-git plugin somehow can deal with named
branches, which I still was not able to verify.

I noticed that both helix and sourcehut don't offer 
hg log -G

(Which I really miss).

So I thought one possible explanation is that they really can't because
they use  the plugin.