Solaris 11.4 hosted repository, TortoiseHG clone attempt consumes all resources
Scott Newman - NOAA Affiliate
scott.newman at noaa.gov
Tue Jun 23 20:19:58 UTC 2020
> >>>>>>> Good morning everyone!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We are currently using Mercurial 5.2.2 hosted on Solaris 11.3 and accessed
> >>>>>>> by contributors via TortoiseHG 5.0.2 from their Windows Desktops. We are
> >>>>>>> in the process of migrating applications to new hosts running Solaris
> >>>>>>> 11.4.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> As far as I understand, you use the same versions (Mercurial 5.2.2 on
> >>>>>> server TortoiseHG 5.0.2 on client) and the same python (probably 2.7
> >>>>>> something?) The only software version difference is Solaris 11.3 vs
> >>>>>> Solaris 11.4, right ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Pierre-Yves, so nice to hear from you! Correct. Python 2.7.18 (tried
> >>>>> some others with the same result). I have an update that when we
> >>>>> tried going back to THG 3.4 the clone worked as expected, but that
> >>>>> doesn't seem like a good long-term solution, particularly since we
> >>>>> will lose the ability to export-archive that was introduced somewhere
> >>>>> around version 4.5, if you recall.
> >>>>
> >>>> That is very interesting, We are talking about using THG 3.4 on the
> >>>> client right? with still using Mercurial 5.2.2 on the server, right?
> >>>
> >>> Correct. It is so interesting that the client can have such an impact
> >>> on the server!
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> If so, this means using a new protocol feature introduced in betwen 3.4
> >>>> and 5.2 reveal the issue.
> >>>>
> >>>> Can you confirm this? And if so, can you try to find the exact Mercurial
> >>>> version client side that trigger this issue?
> >>>
> >>> I am scheduled to work on this with another resource tomorrow at 15:00
> >>> EST and will update this thread. We have confirmed that the problem
> >>> exists in THG4.5.0, so it will be somewhere in between 3.4 and 4.5.0.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> However, the export-archive thingy is something you run server side,
> >>>> don't you?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> We perform this task on the client side now with the archive function
> >>> and have abandoned the customization in favor of the built-in archive
> >>> functionality added
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> When trying to clone a copy of the repository hosted on Solaris
> >>>>>>> 11.4 the clone runs very slowly and the process consumes most of the
> >>>>>>> memory (64GB) on the host, starts generating "-bash: fork: Resource
> >>>>>>> temporarily unavailable" errors for users on the box after about 2
> >>>>>>> minutes, and the clone process fails with a " Server Unexpectedly closed
> >>>>>>> connection" message.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So, the serveur hosting the repository is crumbly while cloning right?
> >>>>>> how are you cloning ? ssh or http ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cloning via ssh.
> >>>>
> >>>> Great, can you add:
> >>>>
> >>>> [ui]
> >>>> debug=yes
> >>>>
> >>>> In the HGRC of the remote repository and run a clone, this you give you
> >>>> a tons of remote output that might help to understand what is going on
> >>>> when the memory explode.
> >>>
> >>> Here is the result on the client BEFORE adding debug:
> >>> % hg clone --verbose ssh://<username>@<hostname>//<dirname>/<reponame>
> >>> "C:\Repos\test"
> >>> requesting all changes
> >>> adding changesets
> >>> adding manifests
> >>> adding file changes ### Processes 123/5396 files, takes 10-15
> >>> minutes, fails here
> >>> transaction abort!
> >>> rollback completed
> >>> abort: stream ended unexpectedly (got 20593 bytes, expected 32768)
> >>> [command returned code 255 Mon Jun 22 15:31:39 2020]
> >>>
> >>> When I add the debug entry it stalls at:
> >>> % hg clone --verbose ssh://<username>@<hostname>//<dirname>/<reponame>
> >>> "C:\Repos\test"
> >>> requesting all changes ### stalls here
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> The same process on Solaris 11.3 has a negligible
> >>>>>>> impact on resources and finishes in about 10 minutes.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I have spent several days with the Network and Systems Administrators
> >>>>>>> trying to resolve this issue without success. We tried many things,
> >>>>>>> including adjusting resource configurations, rebuilding Mercurial and
> >>>>>>> Python, using Mercurial and Python from the working server, using the
> >>>>>>> pre-built package from Oracle (v4.9.1),
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> How did you transfer the repository between the two servers?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I used hg clone (via ssh) between the servers without issue.
> >>>>
> >>>> This clone might have upgraded the repository to newer format, and
> >>>> jumped on an unknown issue affecting you repository. what does `hg
> >>>> debugformat` says on the older server?
> >>>
> >>> On older server:
> >>> format-variant repo
> >>> fncache: yes
> >>> dotencode: yes
> >>> generaldelta: yes
> >>> sparserevlog: no
> >>> sidedata: no
> >>> copies-sdc: no
> >>> plain-cl-delta: no
> >>> compression: zlib
> >>> compression-level: default
> >>
> >> Okay, so the most notable difference is `sparserevlog`. You might
> >> encounter some unknown pathologilab. Can you try making a new server
> >> clone using `--config format.sparse-revlog=no` during the clone ?
> >>
> >
> > I created a new server clone using:
> > hg clone --config format.sparse-revlog=no --noupdate
> > ssh://<username>@<hostname>/<SRCreponame> <TARGETreponame>
> > When I tried to clone with THG 5.0.2 via the UI I saw the same behavior.
> > When I performed the clone via the console using:
> > hg clone --config format.sparse-revlog=no --verbose
> > ssh://<username>@<hostname>/<SRCreponame> "<TARGETreponame"
> > I saw the same behavior.
>
> You are cloning from the Solaris 11.3 machine into the solaris 11.4
> machine right ? can you double check the `hg debugformat` of the
> resulting clone ?
>
Correct, I cloned to 11.4 machine from 11.3 machine, then tried to
clone to Windows machine from 11.4 machine using THG 5.0.2. Here are
the hg debugformat results:
format-variant repo
fncache: yes
dotencode: yes
generaldelta: yes
sparserevlog: no
sidedata: no
copies-sdc: no
plain-cl-delta: yes
compression: zlib
compression-level: default
Scott
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list