any change to get an equivalent to git-worktree ?

[Uwe Brauer]

>>> "AB" == Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab at web.de> writes:

> Uwe Brauer <oub at mat.ucm.es> writes:

>> I see, I would have thought you used hg-git at work 😇  (now that is
>> supports named branches)

> I would like to, but we have a one million line codebase, so hg-git has
> too much overhead.

> I just can’t afford the conversion time at our rate of changes.

I can understand your pain, GNU emacs is already a bit difficult to
manage with hg-git, I imagine a larger codebase is much worse.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5673 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20220225/e1aa193a/attachment.p7s>