hg up and phases, surprises

[Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide]

Uwe Brauer <oub at mat.ucm.es> writes:

>>> In that case it would be great if you could file it as a bug and add the
>>> reproduction commands.
>
>> There is a frequent confusion about the `phases.publish` configuration
>> item : it is not about what happens with local manipulation commands
>> such as `hg update`. Instead, it is about what happens when the
>> repository is being pushed to.
>
>
> Right, I just wanted to ask. Because I was pushing to a remote repository and that is set to 
>
> publish = True
>
> And I cannot change that.
>
> What I did change was the local setting, but as Georges point out that is not the point.
>
> So the question Arne is, if the remote repository is set to publish, is
> it still a bug I observe or not, before sending my recipe.

Do you have the evolve extension active?
If yes, can you try it without evolve?

If it also happens without evolve, I think it is a bug.
If it does not, it may be a bug in evolve, or a different concept with topics.

Best wishes,
Arne
-- 
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
draketo.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1125 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20230526/530b762b/attachment-0001.asc>